On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 23:16:13 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Anyways, that requires a new patch to be created on top as this has hit > > the mainline as a fix already. > > Oops, I missed that. Yeah, I took that because it matched the original case, which was it being u64. -- Steve