Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Multi-gen LRU: fix per-zone reclaim" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:58:54AM -0700, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 6:04 AM <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> >
> > To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
> >
> > git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
> > git checkout FETCH_HEAD
> > git cherry-pick -x 669281ee7ef731fb5204df9d948669bf32a5e68d
> > # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
> > git commit -s
> > git send-email --to '<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' --in-reply-to '2023090959-mothproof-scarf-6195@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
> >
> > Possible dependencies:
> >
> > 669281ee7ef7 ("Multi-gen LRU: fix per-zone reclaim")
> > 6df1b2212950 ("mm: multi-gen LRU: rename lrugen->lists[] to lrugen->folios[]")
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Can you apply in this order please:
> 
> 1) 6df1b2212950 ("mm: multi-gen LRU: rename lrugen->lists[] to
> lrugen->folios[]")
> 2) 669281ee7ef7 ("Multi-gen LRU: fix per-zone reclaim")
> 
> With the one rename dependency, I've checked that this applies cleanly
> and tested it.
> Or let me know if you prefer I resend both.

That worked, now queued up, thanks!

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux