Le 12/09/2023 à 17:44, Liam R. Howlett a écrit : > diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c > index dbe1fe76be34..fd4739918a94 100644 > --- a/init/main.c > +++ b/init/main.c > @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ noinline void __ref __noreturn rest_init(void) > */ > rcu_read_lock(); > tsk = find_task_by_pid_ns(pid, &init_pid_ns); > - tsk->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY; > + tsk->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY & PF_IDLE; Is it really what you want to do ? PF_NO_SETAFFINITY is 0x04000000 and PF_IDLE is 0x00000002 so PF_NO_SETAFFINITY & PF_IDLE is 0 Didn't you mean to do PF_NO_SETAFFINITY | PF_IDLE ? Regardless, with either change I don't get the warning anymore. > set_cpus_allowed_ptr(tsk, cpumask_of(smp_processor_id())); > rcu_read_unlock(); > > @@ -943,6 +943,7 @@ void start_kernel(void) > * time - but meanwhile we still have a functioning scheduler. > */ > sched_init(); > + current->flags &= ~PF_IDLE; > > if (WARN(!irqs_disabled(), > "Interrupts were enabled *very* early, fixing it\n")) >
