[PATCH 6.1 595/600] NFSv4.2: Fix a potential double free with READ_PLUS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 43439d858bbae244a510de47f9a55f667ca4ed52 upstream.

kfree()-ing the scratch page isn't enough, we also need to set the pointer
back to NULL to avoid a double-free in the case of a resend.

Fixes: fbd2a05f29a9 (NFSv4.2: Rework scratch handling for READ_PLUS)
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5444,10 +5444,18 @@ static bool nfs4_read_plus_not_supported
 	return false;
 }
 
-static int nfs4_read_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr)
+static inline void nfs4_read_plus_scratch_free(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr)
 {
-	if (hdr->res.scratch)
+	if (hdr->res.scratch) {
 		kfree(hdr->res.scratch);
+		hdr->res.scratch = NULL;
+	}
+}
+
+static int nfs4_read_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr)
+{
+	nfs4_read_plus_scratch_free(hdr);
+
 	if (!nfs4_sequence_done(task, &hdr->res.seq_res))
 		return -EAGAIN;
 	if (nfs4_read_stateid_changed(task, &hdr->args))





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux