6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 811915db674f8daf19bb4fcb67da9017235ce26d ]
There is no way where topts.repeat can be set to 1 when tc_test fails.
Fix the typo where the break statement slipped by one line.
Fixes: fb66223a244f ("selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type")
Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230814031434.3077944-1-zouyipeng@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
index a543742cd7bd1..2eb71559713c9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ static void verify_fail(struct kfunc_test_params *param)
case tc_test:
topts.data_in = &pkt_v4;
topts.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4);
- break;
topts.repeat = 1;
+ break;
}
skel = kfunc_call_fail__open_opts(&opts);
--
2.40.1
