On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 03:42:43PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [ Upstream commit 3e8bcec0787d1a73703c915c31cb00a2fd18ccbf ]
>
> snd_soc_dai_driver has .ops for call back functions (A), but it also
> has other call back functions (B). It is duplicated and confusable.
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Stable-dep-of: 5e5f68ca836e ("ASoC: fsl: merge DAI call back functions into ops")
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
This is a code refactoring. It is obviously not suitable for stable,
it's not even a warning fix or anything - just a refactoring. You've
marked it as a dependency of another patch which is doing the
refactoring in a specific driver which obviously shouldn't be being
backported either.
To repeat what I said the other day in response to the other wildly
inappropriate backports (one was an entirely new driver...) I thought
that there was supposed to be some manual review of the patches being
included in stable prior to them being sent out. How on earth are
things like this getting as far as being even proposed for stable?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
