This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
block: fix alignment_offset math that assumes io_min is a power-of-2
to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
block-fix-alignment_offset-math-that-assumes-io_min-is-a-power-of-2.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From b8839b8c55f3fdd60dc36abcda7e0266aff7985c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:26:13 -0400
Subject: block: fix alignment_offset math that assumes io_min is a power-of-2
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit b8839b8c55f3fdd60dc36abcda7e0266aff7985c upstream.
The math in both blk_stack_limits() and queue_limit_alignment_offset()
assume that a block device's io_min (aka minimum_io_size) is always a
power-of-2. Fix the math such that it works for non-power-of-2 io_min.
This issue (of alignment_offset != 0) became apparent when testing
dm-thinp with a thinp blocksize that matches a RAID6 stripesize of
1280K. Commit fdfb4c8c1 ("dm thin: set minimum_io_size to pool's data
block size") unlocked the potential for alignment_offset != 0 due to
the dm-thin-pool's io_min possibly being a non-power-of-2.
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/blk-settings.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/blkdev.h | 5 ++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits
bottom = max(b->physical_block_size, b->io_min) + alignment;
/* Verify that top and bottom intervals line up */
- if (max(top, bottom) & (min(top, bottom) - 1)) {
+ if (max(top, bottom) % min(top, bottom)) {
t->misaligned = 1;
ret = -1;
}
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits
/* Find lowest common alignment_offset */
t->alignment_offset = lcm(t->alignment_offset, alignment)
- & (max(t->physical_block_size, t->io_min) - 1);
+ % max(t->physical_block_size, t->io_min);
/* Verify that new alignment_offset is on a logical block boundary */
if (t->alignment_offset & (t->logical_block_size - 1)) {
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -1232,10 +1232,9 @@ static inline int queue_alignment_offset
static inline int queue_limit_alignment_offset(struct queue_limits *lim, sector_t sector)
{
unsigned int granularity = max(lim->physical_block_size, lim->io_min);
- unsigned int alignment = (sector << 9) & (granularity - 1);
+ unsigned int alignment = sector_div(sector, granularity >> 9) << 9;
- return (granularity + lim->alignment_offset - alignment)
- & (granularity - 1);
+ return (granularity + lim->alignment_offset - alignment) % granularity;
}
static inline int bdev_alignment_offset(struct block_device *bdev)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx are
queue-3.14/dm-bufio-when-done-scanning-return-from-__scan-immediately.patch
queue-3.14/block-fix-alignment_offset-math-that-assumes-io_min-is-a-power-of-2.patch
queue-3.14/dm-bufio-update-last_accessed-when-relinking-a-buffer.patch
queue-3.14/dm-log-userspace-fix-memory-leak-in-dm_ulog_tfr_init-failure-path.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html