Patch "sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock

to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     sched-use-dl_bw_of-under-rcu-read-lock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 66339c31bc3978d5fff9c4b4cb590a861def4db2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:36:24 +0400
Subject: sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock

From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 66339c31bc3978d5fff9c4b4cb590a861def4db2 upstream.

dl_bw_of() dereferences rq->rd which has to have RCU read lock held.
Probability of use-after-free isn't zero here.

Also add lockdep assert into dl_bw_cpus().

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140922183624.11015.71558.stgit@localhost
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 kernel/sched/core.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1895,6 +1895,8 @@ unsigned long to_ratio(u64 period, u64 r
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
 {
+	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+			   "sched RCU must be held");
 	return &cpu_rq(i)->rd->dl_bw;
 }
 
@@ -1903,6 +1905,8 @@ static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
 	struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd;
 	int cpus = 0;
 
+	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+			   "sched RCU must be held");
 	for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask)
 		cpus++;
 
@@ -7458,6 +7462,8 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(v
 	int cpu, ret = 0;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
 	/*
 	 * Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some
 	 * value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in
@@ -7479,6 +7485,8 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(v
 			break;
 	}
 
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -7494,6 +7502,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
 	if (global_rt_runtime() != RUNTIME_INF)
 		new_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime());
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	/*
 	 * FIXME: As above...
 	 */
@@ -7504,6 +7513,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
 		dl_b->bw = new_bw;
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 static int sched_rt_global_validate(void)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are

queue-3.14/sched-use-dl_bw_of-under-rcu-read-lock.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]