On 29/08/2023 13:12, Rand Deeb wrote: > In the line 910, the value of m1 may be zero, so there is a possibility > of dividing by zero, we fixed it by checking the values before dividing > (found with SVACE). In the same way, after checking and reading the > function, we found that lines 906, 908, 912 have the same situation, so > we fixed them as well. > > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. > > Signed-off-by: Rand Deeb <deeb.rand@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/ssb/main.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c > index 0a26984acb2c..e0776a16d04d 100644 > --- a/drivers/ssb/main.c > +++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c > @@ -903,13 +903,21 @@ u32 ssb_calc_clock_rate(u32 plltype, u32 n, u32 m) > case SSB_CHIPCO_CLK_MC_BYPASS: > return clock; > case SSB_CHIPCO_CLK_MC_M1: > - return (clock / m1); > + if (m1 !=3D 0) Address list does not look like patch for mainline, but anyway: Your patch is corrupted. Fix your email setup. Best regards, Krzysztof
