5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 4d413ae9ced4180c0e2114553c3a7560b509b0f8 ]
This patch refactors do_unlock_close() by using only struct dlm_plock_info
as a parameter.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
Stable-dep-of: 57e2c2f2d94c ("fs: dlm: fix mismatch of plock results from userspace")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/dlm/plock.c | 16 ++++++----------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c
index 0d00ca2c44c71..fa8969c0a5f55 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/plock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c
@@ -80,8 +80,7 @@ static void send_op(struct plock_op *op)
abandoned waiter. So, we have to insert the unlock-close when the
lock call is interrupted. */
-static void do_unlock_close(struct dlm_ls *ls, u64 number,
- struct file *file, struct file_lock *fl)
+static void do_unlock_close(const struct dlm_plock_info *info)
{
struct plock_op *op;
@@ -90,15 +89,12 @@ static void do_unlock_close(struct dlm_ls *ls, u64 number,
return;
op->info.optype = DLM_PLOCK_OP_UNLOCK;
- op->info.pid = fl->fl_pid;
- op->info.fsid = ls->ls_global_id;
- op->info.number = number;
+ op->info.pid = info->pid;
+ op->info.fsid = info->fsid;
+ op->info.number = info->number;
op->info.start = 0;
op->info.end = OFFSET_MAX;
- if (fl->fl_lmops && fl->fl_lmops->lm_grant)
- op->info.owner = (__u64) fl->fl_pid;
- else
- op->info.owner = (__u64)(long) fl->fl_owner;
+ op->info.owner = info->owner;
op->info.flags |= DLM_PLOCK_FL_CLOSE;
send_op(op);
@@ -168,7 +164,7 @@ int dlm_posix_lock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
__func__, ls->ls_global_id,
(unsigned long long)number, op->info.pid);
dlm_release_plock_op(op);
- do_unlock_close(ls, number, file, fl);
+ do_unlock_close(&op->info);
goto out;
}
--
2.40.1
