[PATCH 6.4 055/129] wifi: mac80211: limit reorder_buf_filtered to avoid UBSAN warning

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

6.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>

commit b98c16107cc1647242abbd11f234c05a3a5864f6 upstream.

The commit 06470f7468c8 ("mac80211: add API to allow filtering frames in BA sessions")
added reorder_buf_filtered to mark frames filtered by firmware, and it
can only work correctly if hw.max_rx_aggregation_subframes <= 64 since
it stores the bitmap in a u64 variable.

However, new HE or EHT devices can support BlockAck number up to 256 or
1024, and then using a higher subframe index leads UBSAN warning:

 UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in net/mac80211/rx.c:1129:39
 shift exponent 215 is too large for 64-bit type 'long long unsigned int'
 Call Trace:
  <IRQ>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x70
  dump_stack+0x10/0x20
  __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1ac/0x360
  ieee80211_release_reorder_frame.constprop.0.cold+0x64/0x69 [mac80211]
  ieee80211_sta_reorder_release+0x9c/0x400 [mac80211]
  ieee80211_prepare_and_rx_handle+0x1234/0x1420 [mac80211]
  ieee80211_rx_list+0xaef/0xf60 [mac80211]
  ieee80211_rx_napi+0x53/0xd0 [mac80211]

Since only old hardware that supports <=64 BlockAck uses
ieee80211_mark_rx_ba_filtered_frames(), limit the use as it is, so add a
WARN_ONCE() and comment to note to avoid using this function if hardware
capability is not suitable.

Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230818014004.16177-1-pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx
[edit commit message]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/net/mac80211.h |    1 +
 net/mac80211/rx.c      |   12 ++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/include/net/mac80211.h
+++ b/include/net/mac80211.h
@@ -6578,6 +6578,7 @@ void ieee80211_stop_rx_ba_session(struct
  * marks frames marked in the bitmap as having been filtered. Afterwards, it
  * checks if any frames in the window starting from @ssn can now be released
  * (in case they were only waiting for frames that were filtered.)
+ * (Only work correctly if @max_rx_aggregation_subframes <= 64 frames)
  */
 void ieee80211_mark_rx_ba_filtered_frames(struct ieee80211_sta *pubsta, u8 tid,
 					  u16 ssn, u64 filtered,
--- a/net/mac80211/rx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c
@@ -1083,7 +1083,8 @@ static inline bool ieee80211_rx_reorder_
 	struct sk_buff *tail = skb_peek_tail(frames);
 	struct ieee80211_rx_status *status;
 
-	if (tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf_filtered & BIT_ULL(index))
+	if (tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf_filtered &&
+	    tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf_filtered & BIT_ULL(index))
 		return true;
 
 	if (!tail)
@@ -1124,7 +1125,8 @@ static void ieee80211_release_reorder_fr
 	}
 
 no_frame:
-	tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf_filtered &= ~BIT_ULL(index);
+	if (tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf_filtered)
+		tid_agg_rx->reorder_buf_filtered &= ~BIT_ULL(index);
 	tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num = ieee80211_sn_inc(tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num);
 }
 
@@ -4245,6 +4247,7 @@ void ieee80211_mark_rx_ba_filtered_frame
 					  u16 ssn, u64 filtered,
 					  u16 received_mpdus)
 {
+	struct ieee80211_local *local;
 	struct sta_info *sta;
 	struct tid_ampdu_rx *tid_agg_rx;
 	struct sk_buff_head frames;
@@ -4262,6 +4265,11 @@ void ieee80211_mark_rx_ba_filtered_frame
 
 	sta = container_of(pubsta, struct sta_info, sta);
 
+	local = sta->sdata->local;
+	WARN_ONCE(local->hw.max_rx_aggregation_subframes > 64,
+		  "RX BA marker can't support max_rx_aggregation_subframes %u > 64\n",
+		  local->hw.max_rx_aggregation_subframes);
+
 	if (!ieee80211_rx_data_set_sta(&rx, sta, -1))
 		return;