[Cc: +Andy, +Joe]
Dear Jarkko, dear Andy, dear Joe,
Am 23.08.23 um 19:40 schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen:
On Wed Aug 23, 2023 at 11:23 AM EEST, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am 23.08.23 um 01:15 schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen:
The vendor check introduced by commit 554b841d4703 ("tpm: Disable RNG for
all AMD fTPMs") doesn't work properly on a number of Intel fTPMs. On the
reported systems the TPM doesn't reply at bootup and returns back the
command code. This makes the TPM fail probe.
Since only Microsoft Pluton is the only known combination of AMD CPU and
fTPM from other vendor, disable hwrng otherwise. In order to make sysadmin
aware of this, print also info message to the klog.
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 554b841d4703 ("tpm: Disable RNG for all AMD fTPMs")
Reported-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@xxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217804
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mario’s patch also had the three reporters below listed:
Reported-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx>
Reported-by: Ronan Pigott <ronan@xxxxxx>
Reported-by: Raymond Jay Golo <rjgolo@xxxxxxxxx>
The problem here is that checkpatch throws three warnings:
WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report
#19:
Reported-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx>
Reported-by: Ronan Pigott <ronan@xxxxxx>
WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report
#20:
Reported-by: Ronan Pigott <ronan@xxxxxx>
Reported-by: Raymond Jay Golo <rjgolo@xxxxxxxxx>
WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report
#21:
Reported-by: Raymond Jay Golo <rjgolo@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Since bugzilla is not part of the documented process afaik, I used this
field as the guideline:
Reported: 2023-08-17 20:59 UTC by Todd Brandt
How otherwise I should interpret kernel bugzilla?
How is the proper process to add more than one reporter (so they are
noted and also added to CC), so that checkpatch.pl does not complain?
Kind regards,
Paul
In any case new version is still needed as the commit message must
contain a mention of "Lenovo Legion Y540" as the stimulus for doing
this code change in the first place.
BR, Jarkko
