Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/194] 6.1.47-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

[Adding Peter Zijlstra to CC]

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 04:25:22PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 01:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.47 release.
> > There are 194 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Aug 2023 19:40:45 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.47-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> NOTE:
> Kernel warnings noticed on x86_64 while booting the kernel.
> Paul E. McKenney reported this last week [1] and discussions email
> thread provided here.
> 
>  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4dc3d0ec-b827-4bce-8927-cfa5d837fd03@paulmck-laptop/T/

Seeing the same warning for the 6.1.47-rc1, which is missing
4ae68b26c3ab ("objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess"). Unfortunately the commit
will not apply cleanly to 6.1.y. 

I guess we need at least as well dbcdbdfdf137 ("objtool: Rework
instruction -> symbol mapping"), but not sure this is enough.

Peter, is this correct?

Regards,
Salvatore



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux