On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:13:39PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > 1911 is still being investigated (some additional eyes on it would not > > hurt). > > I'm hoping that we can take this one: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809072200.543939260@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > which should resolve this issue, right? Yes, it does, as least for mainline and 6.4. The backport to 6.1 seems hairy (due to a lack of call depth tracking me thinks). It may be worth taking Nick's change there for simplicity's sake but I'll let y'all make that decision. Cheers, Nathan
