Re: [PATCH v2] bitops: Fix shift overflow in GENMASK macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:03:57AM +0100, Maxime COQUELIN wrote:

> -#define GENMASK(h, l)		(((U32_C(1) << ((h) - (l) + 1)) - 1) << (l))
> -#define GENMASK_ULL(h, l)	(((U64_C(1) << ((h) - (l) + 1)) - 1) << (l))
> +#define GENMASK(h, l)     ((~0UL >> (BITS_PER_LONG - (h - l + 1))) << l)
> +#define GENMASK_ULL(h, l) ((~0ULL >> (BITS_PER_LONG_LONG - (h - l + 1))) << l)

OK, so you need to keep the (h) and (l) bits, macro arguments should be
wrapped in seemingly superfluous braces in order to preserve precedence
on expansion.

My bad for not explicitly doing that when suggesting the alternative.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]