3.2.64-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 614a80e474b227cace52fd6e3c790554db8a396e upstream.
In the early days, we had some special handling for the
KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC exit, but this was gone in 2009 with commit
d7b0b5eb3000 (KVM: s390: Make psw available on all exits, not
just a subset).
Now this switch statement is just a sanity check for userspace
not messing with the kvm_run structure. Unfortunately, this
allows userspace to trigger a kernel BUG. Let's just remove
this switch statement.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -516,16 +516,6 @@ rerun_vcpu:
BUG_ON(vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int.local_int[vcpu->vcpu_id] == NULL);
- switch (kvm_run->exit_reason) {
- case KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC:
- case KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN:
- case KVM_EXIT_INTR:
- case KVM_EXIT_S390_RESET:
- break;
- default:
- BUG();
- }
-
vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask = kvm_run->psw_mask;
vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr = kvm_run->psw_addr;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html