From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 22db41226b679768df8f0a4ff5de8e58f625f45b ] Currently find_and_alloc_map() performs two separate functions: some argument sanity checking and partial map creation workflow hanling. Neither of those functions are self-sufficient and are augmented by further checks and initialization logic in the caller (map_create() function). So unify all the sanity checks, permission checks, and creation and initialization logic in one linear piece of code in map_create() instead. This also make it easier to further enhance permission checks and keep them located in one place. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230613223533.3689589-3-andrii@xxxxxxxxxx Stable-dep-of: 640a604585aa ("bpf, cpumap: Make sure kthread is running before map update returns") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 0a7238125e1a4..8fddf0eea9bf2 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -109,37 +109,6 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops bpf_map_offload_ops = { .map_mem_usage = bpf_map_offload_map_mem_usage, }; -static struct bpf_map *find_and_alloc_map(union bpf_attr *attr) -{ - const struct bpf_map_ops *ops; - u32 type = attr->map_type; - struct bpf_map *map; - int err; - - if (type >= ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_map_types)) - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); - type = array_index_nospec(type, ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_map_types)); - ops = bpf_map_types[type]; - if (!ops) - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); - - if (ops->map_alloc_check) { - err = ops->map_alloc_check(attr); - if (err) - return ERR_PTR(err); - } - if (attr->map_ifindex) - ops = &bpf_map_offload_ops; - if (!ops->map_mem_usage) - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); - map = ops->map_alloc(attr); - if (IS_ERR(map)) - return map; - map->ops = ops; - map->map_type = type; - return map; -} - static void bpf_map_write_active_inc(struct bpf_map *map) { atomic64_inc(&map->writecnt); @@ -1127,7 +1096,9 @@ static int map_check_btf(struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf *btf, /* called via syscall */ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr) { + const struct bpf_map_ops *ops; int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr); + u32 map_type = attr->map_type; struct bpf_map *map; int f_flags; int err; @@ -1157,6 +1128,25 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr) !node_online(numa_node))) return -EINVAL; + /* find map type and init map: hashtable vs rbtree vs bloom vs ... */ + map_type = attr->map_type; + if (map_type >= ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_map_types)) + return -EINVAL; + map_type = array_index_nospec(map_type, ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_map_types)); + ops = bpf_map_types[map_type]; + if (!ops) + return -EINVAL; + + if (ops->map_alloc_check) { + err = ops->map_alloc_check(attr); + if (err) + return err; + } + if (attr->map_ifindex) + ops = &bpf_map_offload_ops; + if (!ops->map_mem_usage) + return -EINVAL; + /* Intent here is for unprivileged_bpf_disabled to block BPF map * creation for unprivileged users; other actions depend * on fd availability and access to bpffs, so are dependent on @@ -1166,10 +1156,11 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr) if (sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled && !bpf_capable()) return -EPERM; - /* find map type and init map: hashtable vs rbtree vs bloom vs ... */ - map = find_and_alloc_map(attr); + map = ops->map_alloc(attr); if (IS_ERR(map)) return PTR_ERR(map); + map->ops = ops; + map->map_type = map_type; err = bpf_obj_name_cpy(map->name, attr->map_name, sizeof(attr->map_name)); -- 2.40.1
