[patch added to the 3.12 stable tree] ext2: Fix fs corruption in ext2_get_xip_mem()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

This patch has been added to the 3.12 stable tree. If you have any
objections, please let us know.

===============

commit 7ba3ec5749ddb61f79f7be17b5fd7720eebc52de upstream.

Commit 8e3dffc651cb "Ext2: mark inode dirty after the function
dquot_free_block_nodirty is called" unveiled a bug in __ext2_get_block()
called from ext2_get_xip_mem(). That function called ext2_get_block()
mistakenly asking it to map 0 blocks while 1 was intended. Before the
above mentioned commit things worked out fine by luck but after that commit
we started returning that we allocated 0 blocks while we in fact
allocated 1 block and thus allocation was looping until all blocks in
the filesystem were exhausted.

Fix the problem by properly asking for one block and also add assertion
in ext2_get_blocks() to catch similar problems.

Reported-and-tested-by: Andiry Xu <andiry.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ext2/inode.c | 2 ++
 fs/ext2/xip.c   | 1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
index c260de6d7b6d..8a337640a46a 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
@@ -632,6 +632,8 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode *inode,
 	int count = 0;
 	ext2_fsblk_t first_block = 0;
 
+	BUG_ON(maxblocks == 0);
+
 	depth = ext2_block_to_path(inode,iblock,offsets,&blocks_to_boundary);
 
 	if (depth == 0)
diff --git a/fs/ext2/xip.c b/fs/ext2/xip.c
index 1c3312858fcf..e98171a11cfe 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/xip.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/xip.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ __ext2_get_block(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t pgoff, int create,
 	int rc;
 
 	memset(&tmp, 0, sizeof(struct buffer_head));
+	tmp.b_size = 1 << inode->i_blkbits;
 	rc = ext2_get_block(inode, pgoff, &tmp, create);
 	*result = tmp.b_blocknr;
 
-- 
2.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]