On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 04:01:03PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 6:44 PM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v6.1+ > > Applied to `rust-next`, thanks! > > However, should this go to stable? The actual functions being called > are the `__rust_*` ones (until they get removed in 1.71), no? Thus Interesting, I wasn't aware of the `__rust_*` "hack" here, so you are right, this doesn't fix the issue in stable kernels. > this is not actually fixing the actual functions being called, right? > > If that is correct, then the fix should change the functions below, > perhaps adding `krealloc_with_flags()` from the other patch (it does > not need to be a method, by the way), and calling it with a `Layout` > like the generated ones do. Then I can rebase `rust-next` on top of Sounds good, however I think it'll be better if I resend this one, and the other one originally from Bjorn based on the introduction of function `krealloc_with_flags` (I will name it as `krealloc_aligned`, since it's a function that returns a aligned object with krealloc). Thoughts? Regards, Boqun > the fix that adds the `krealloc_with_flags()`. > > Cheers, > Miguel
