On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yeah, if nobody is using such devices, then we should get rid of them,
> but I prefer to have this on a separate patch, in order to give
> people the opportunity to complain.
Yes, I would definitely suggest a separate patch. There's no reason
it should be mixed in with your general cleanup of the ALSA quirks.
> So, if I'm understanding well, you're suggesting to add a patch
> removing those 5 entries (and the corresponding quirks on alsa),
> right?
>
> { USB_DEVICE(0x2040, 0x7201),
> .driver_info = AU0828_BOARD_HAUPPAUGE_HVR950Q_MXL },
> { USB_DEVICE(0x2040, 0x7211),
> .driver_info = AU0828_BOARD_HAUPPAUGE_HVR950Q_MXL },
> { USB_DEVICE(0x2040, 0x7281),
> .driver_info = AU0828_BOARD_HAUPPAUGE_HVR950Q_MXL },
> { USB_DEVICE(0x05e1, 0x0480),
> .driver_info = AU0828_BOARD_HAUPPAUGE_WOODBURY },
> { USB_DEVICE(0x2040, 0x8200),
> .driver_info = AU0828_BOARD_HAUPPAUGE_WOODBURY },
> { USB_DEVICE(0x2040, 0x7260),
Exactly.
Devin
--
Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs
http://www.kernellabs.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html