3.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
commit f6acfd50110b335c7af636cf1fc8e55319cae5fc upstream.
Trying to reproduce a log enospc bug I hit a panic in the async reclaim code
during log replay. This is because we use fs_info->fs_root as our root for
shrinking and such. Technically we can use whatever root we want, but let's
just not allow async reclaim while we're doing log replay. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4502,7 +4502,13 @@ again:
space_info->flush = 1;
} else if (!ret && space_info->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA) {
used += orig_bytes;
- if (need_do_async_reclaim(space_info, root->fs_info, used) &&
+ /*
+ * We will do the space reservation dance during log replay,
+ * which means we won't have fs_info->fs_root set, so don't do
+ * the async reclaim as we will panic.
+ */
+ if (!root->fs_info->log_root_recovering &&
+ need_do_async_reclaim(space_info, root->fs_info, used) &&
!work_busy(&root->fs_info->async_reclaim_work))
queue_work(system_unbound_wq,
&root->fs_info->async_reclaim_work);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html