On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 11:14:37AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 03:50:56PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Junhao He <hejunhao3@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 1a51688474c0d395b864e98236335fba712e29bf ]
Compared to the original PA device, H60PA offers higher bandwidth.
The H60PA is a new device and we use HID to differentiate them.
The events supported by PAv3 and PAv2 are different. The PAv3 PMU
removed some events which are supported by PAv2 PMU. The older PA
PMU driver will probe v3 as v2. Therefore PA events displayed by
"perf list" cannot work properly. We add the HISI0275 HID for PAv3
PMU to distinguish different.
For each H60PA PMU, except for the overflow interrupt register, other
functions of the H60PA PMU are the same as the original PA PMU module.
It has 8-programable counters and each counter is free-running.
Interrupt is supported to handle counter (64-bits) overflow.
Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615125926.29832-2-hejunhao3@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pa_pmu.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++---
drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.h | 8 ++
2 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Why is this being backported to stable?
This patch adds supoprt for new HW, and is clearly not a fix, so it's not clear
to me why it has been selected.
I'll drop it, thanks.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
