On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 17:05:59 -0500, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 7/18/23 14:57, Haitao Huang wrote:
Okay, that explains. I would consider it still triggered by high
pressure blips 😄
I'm talking about a "blip" being a single allocation. It's *LITERALLY*
the smallest (aka. lowest) possible quantum of memory pressure.
So go ahead and try to write the changelog without "high" or "low".
But, sheesh, if you and are somehow using "high" and "low" to describe
the exact same condition, I think that's a rather large communication or
understanding problem somewhere. It doesn't bode well for this simple
patch.
Sorry that did not come across right. I'll send v3 (please skip v2) with
the comments added as you suggested.
Thanks a lot for your time and the review.
BR
Haitao
