On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 20:07, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 02:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.39 release. > > There are 589 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 19 Jul 2023 20:14:46 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.39-rc3.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > As you know LKFT runs latest kselftests from stable 6.4 on > stable rc 6.1 branches and found two test failures on this > round of stable rc review 6.1.39-rc3 compared with 6.1.37. > > Test regressions: > > * bcm2711-rpi-4-b, kselftest-kvm > - kvm_get-reg-list > > * x86, kselftest-kvm > - kvm_vmx_pmu_caps_test These two test failures are not kernel regressions. However, these are due to latest kselftests on older kernels. - Naresh
