[PATCH 6.4 049/800] tick/rcu: Fix bogus ratelimit condition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit a7e282c77785c7eabf98836431b1f029481085ad ]

The ratelimit logic in report_idle_softirq() is broken because the
exit condition is always true:

	static int ratelimit;

	if (ratelimit < 10)
		return false;  ---> always returns here

	ratelimit++;           ---> no chance to run

Make it check for >= 10 instead.

Fixes: 0345691b24c0 ("tick/rcu: Stop allowing RCU_SOFTIRQ in idle")
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_5AAA3EEAB42095C9B7740BE62FBF9A67E007@xxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 42c0be3080bde..4df14db4da490 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -1041,7 +1041,7 @@ static bool report_idle_softirq(void)
 			return false;
 	}
 
-	if (ratelimit < 10)
+	if (ratelimit >= 10)
 		return false;
 
 	/* On RT, softirqs handling may be waiting on some lock */
-- 
2.39.2






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux