Re: one 'BUG_ON(ret < 0);' is still left in queue-6.1/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 05:47:03PM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 07:02:27AM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > one 'BUG_ON(ret < 0);' is still left in queue-6.1/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch 
> > > 
> > > so we need to rebase this patch.
> > 
> > Great, can you send a new version for 5.15.y and 6.1.y?
> 
> queue-5.15/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch is GOOD.
> queue-6.1/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch is GOOD.
> 
> and we can 'git am' queue-5.15/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch
> to 6.1.38 cleanly.
> 
> so it is OK to just copy queue-5.15/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch
> as queue-6.1/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch.

Thanks, that worked, now fixed up.

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux