On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 07:10:10PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > This is a RFC and a bit rough for now. I only set down to create the > first of the three patches. But while doing so I noticed a few things > that seemed odd for me with my background on writing and editing texts. > So I just quickly performed a few additional changes to fix those to see > if the stable team would appreciate them, as this document is clearly > their domain. > > If those changes or even the initial patch are not welcomed, I'll simply > drop them. I'd totally understand this, as texts like these are delicate > and it's easy to accidentlly change the intent or the meaning while > adjusting things in good faith. > > At the same time I might be willing to do a few more changes, if people > like the direction this takes and want a bit more fine tuning. I do like it, many thanks for taking the time to do this work, it's much appreciated. If you resend the first 2 as a non-RFC patch, I'll be glad to queue up, the last one needs some more work as mentioned. thanks, greg k-h
