On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 01:50 +0000, Yinjun Zhang wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 4, 2023 12:11 AM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > From: Louis Peens <louis.peens@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 14:01:16 +0200
> >
> > > From: Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > When moving devices from one namespace to another, mc addresses are
> > > cleaned in software while not removed from application firmware. Thus
> > > the mc addresses are remained and will cause resource leak.
> > >
> > > Now use `__dev_mc_unsync` to clean mc addresses when closing port.
> > >
> > > Fixes: e20aa071cd95 ("nfp: fix schedule in atomic context when sync mc
> > address")
> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Signed-off-by: Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Acked-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Louis Peens <louis.peens@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Changes since v1:
> > >
> > > * Use __dev_mc_unsyc to clean mc addresses instead of tracking mc
> > addresses by
> > > driver itself.
> > > * Clean mc addresses when closing port instead of driver exits,
> > > so that the issue of moving devices between namespaces can be fixed.
> > > * Modify commit message accordingly.
> > >
> > > .../ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 171 +++++++++---------
> > > 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > +static int nfp_net_mc_sync(struct net_device *netdev, const unsigned char
> > *addr)
> > > +{
> > > + struct nfp_net *nn = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > > +
> > > + if (netdev_mc_count(netdev) > NFP_NET_CFG_MAC_MC_MAX) {
> > > + nn_err(nn, "Requested number of MC addresses (%d)
> > exceeds maximum (%d).\n",
> > > + netdev_mc_count(netdev),
> > NFP_NET_CFG_MAC_MC_MAX);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return nfp_net_sched_mbox_amsg_work(nn,
> > NFP_NET_CFG_MBOX_CMD_MULTICAST_ADD, addr,
> > > + NFP_NET_CFG_MULTICAST_SZ,
> > nfp_net_mc_cfg);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int nfp_net_mc_unsync(struct net_device *netdev, const unsigned
> > char *addr)
> > > +{
> > > + struct nfp_net *nn = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > > +
> > > + return nfp_net_sched_mbox_amsg_work(nn,
> > NFP_NET_CFG_MBOX_CMD_MULTICAST_DEL, addr,
> > > + NFP_NET_CFG_MULTICAST_SZ,
> > nfp_net_mc_cfg);
> > > +}
> >
> > You can just declare nfp_net_mc_unsync()'s prototype here, so that it
> > will be visible to nfp_net_netdev_close(), without moving the whole set
> > of functions. Either way works, but that one would allow avoiding big
> > diffs not really related to fixing things going through the net-fixes tree.
>
> I didn't know which was preferred. Looks like minimum change is concerned
> more. I'll change it.
That is de-facto mandatory for changes targeting stable:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst#L10
Cheers,
Paolo
