On Thursday, June 29, 2023 2:21 AM, Jacob Keller wrote: > > Is there no way to just ask the kernel what addresses you already have > and avoid the need for a separate copy maintained in the driver? Or > maybe thats something that could be added since this doesn't seem like a > unique problem. > > In fact, we absolutely can: > > __dev_mc_unsync which is the opposite of __dev_mc_sync. > > You can just call that during tear down with an unsync function and you > shouldn't need to bother maintaining your own list at all. Yes, you're right, I'll use _unsync. Thank you. > > > nfp_net_reconfig_wait_posted(nn); > > }
