Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: don't let check_caps skip sending responses for revoke msgs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Milind Changire <mchangir@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 5:29 AM <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> If a client sends out a cap-update request with the old 'seq' just
> before a pending cap revoke request, then the MDS might miscalculate
> the 'seqs' and caps. It's therefore always a good idea to ack the
> cap revoke request with the bumped up 'seq'.
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/61782
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> V2:
> - Rephrased the commit comment for better understanding from Milind
>
>
>  fs/ceph/caps.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/caps.c b/fs/ceph/caps.c
> index 1052885025b3..eee2fbca3430 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/caps.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/caps.c
> @@ -3737,6 +3737,15 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct inode *inode,
>         }
>         BUG_ON(cap->issued & ~cap->implemented);
>
> +       /* don't let check_caps skip sending a response to MDS for revoke msgs */
> +       if (le32_to_cpu(grant->op) == CEPH_CAP_OP_REVOKE) {
> +               cap->mds_wanted = 0;
> +               if (cap == ci->i_auth_cap)
> +                       check_caps = 1; /* check auth cap only */
> +               else
> +                       check_caps = 2; /* check all caps */
> +       }
> +
>         if (extra_info->inline_version > 0 &&
>             extra_info->inline_version >= ci->i_inline_version) {
>                 ci->i_inline_version = extra_info->inline_version;
> --
> 2.40.1
>


-- 
Milind





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux