[PATCH 6.1 122/170] io_uring/net: use the correct msghdr union member in io_sendmsg_copy_hdr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 26fed83653d0154704cadb7afc418f315c7ac1f0 ]

Rather than assign the user pointer to msghdr->msg_control, assign it
to msghdr->msg_control_user to make sparse happy. They are in a union
so the end result is the same, but let's avoid new sparse warnings and
squash this one.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306210654.mDMcyMuB-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
Fixes: cac9e4418f4c ("io_uring/net: save msghdr->msg_control for retries")
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 io_uring/net.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c
index 41f828d93c899..2b44126a876ef 100644
--- a/io_uring/net.c
+++ b/io_uring/net.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int io_sendmsg_copy_hdr(struct io_kiocb *req,
 	ret = sendmsg_copy_msghdr(&iomsg->msg, sr->umsg, sr->msg_flags,
 					&iomsg->free_iov);
 	/* save msg_control as sys_sendmsg() overwrites it */
-	sr->msg_control = iomsg->msg.msg_control;
+	sr->msg_control = iomsg->msg.msg_control_user;
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 
 	if (req_has_async_data(req)) {
 		kmsg = req->async_data;
-		kmsg->msg.msg_control = sr->msg_control;
+		kmsg->msg.msg_control_user = sr->msg_control;
 	} else {
 		ret = io_sendmsg_copy_hdr(req, &iomsg);
 		if (ret)
-- 
2.39.2






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux