[TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression
tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]
On 07.06.23 19:49, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 05:47:57PM +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>> On 06.06.23 08:45, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Lino, it looks like this regression is caused by (backported) commit of yours.
>>>> Would you like to take a look on it?
>>>> Anyway, telling regzbot:
>>>>
>>>> #regzbot introduced: 51162b05a44cb5
>>>
>>> There's some tpm backports to 5.15.y that were suspect and I'll look
>>> into reverting them and see if this was one of the ones that was on that
>>> list. Give me a few days...
>>
>> Could you please consider to apply (mainline) commit 0c7e66e5fd69 ("tpm, tpm_tis: Request threaded
>> interrupt handler") to 5.15.y?
>>
>> As Chris confirmed it fixes the regression caused by 51162b05a44cb5 ("tpm, tpm_tis: Claim locality
>> before writing interrupt registers").
>>
>> Commit 0c7e66e5fd69 is also needed for 5.10.y, 6.1.y and 6.3.y.
>
> Now queued up, thanks.
#regzbot fix: 0c7e66e5fd69
#regzbot ignore-activity
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
