From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit ba00b190670809c1a89326d80de96d714f6004f2 ]
In the same spirit as commit ca57f02295f1 ("afs: Fix fileserver probe
RTT handling"), don't rule out using a vlserver just because there
haven't been enough packets yet to calculate a real rtt. Always set the
server's probe rtt from the estimate provided by rxrpc_kernel_get_srtt,
which is capped at 1 second.
This could lead to EDESTADDRREQ errors when accessing a cell for the
first time, even though the vl servers are known and have responded to a
probe.
Fixes: 1d4adfaf6574 ("rxrpc: Make rxrpc_kernel_get_srtt() indicate validity")
Signed-off-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: linux-afs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2023-June/006746.html
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/afs/vl_probe.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/afs/vl_probe.c b/fs/afs/vl_probe.c
index 081b7e5b13f58..163069d9fc161 100644
--- a/fs/afs/vl_probe.c
+++ b/fs/afs/vl_probe.c
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ void afs_vlserver_probe_result(struct afs_call *call)
}
}
- if (rxrpc_kernel_get_srtt(call->net->socket, call->rxcall, &rtt_us) &&
- rtt_us < server->probe.rtt) {
+ rxrpc_kernel_get_srtt(call->net->socket, call->rxcall, &rtt_us);
+ if (rtt_us < server->probe.rtt) {
server->probe.rtt = rtt_us;
alist->preferred = index;
have_result = true;
--
2.39.2
