From: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
commit deccae40e4b30f98837e44225194d80c8baf2233 upstream.
Commit 619104ba453ad0 ("btrfs: move common NOCOW checks against a file
extent into a helper") changed our call to btrfs_cross_ref_exist() to
always pass false for the 'strict' parameter. We're passing this down
through the stack so that we can do a full check for cross references
during swapfile activation.
With strict always false, this test fails:
btrfs subvol create swappy
chattr +C swappy
fallocate -l1G swappy/swapfile
chmod 600 swappy/swapfile
mkswap swappy/swapfile
btrfs subvol snap swappy swapsnap
btrfs subvol del -C swapsnap
btrfs fi sync /
sync;sync;sync
swapon swappy/swapfile
The fix is to just use args->strict, and everyone except swapfile
activation is passing false.
Fixes: 619104ba453ad0 ("btrfs: move common NOCOW checks against a file extent into a helper")
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ static int can_nocow_file_extent(struct
ret = btrfs_cross_ref_exist(root, btrfs_ino(inode),
key->offset - args->extent_offset,
- args->disk_bytenr, false, path);
+ args->disk_bytenr, args->strict, path);
WARN_ON_ONCE(ret > 0 && is_freespace_inode);
if (ret != 0)
goto out;
