From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit fb1b7be9b16c1f4626969ba4e95a97da2a452b41 ] When CONFIG_PROC_FS is disabled, the function declarations for some procfs functions are hidden, but the definitions are still build, as shown by this compiler warning: net/atm/resources.c:403:7: error: no previous prototype for 'atm_dev_seq_start' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] net/atm/resources.c:409:6: error: no previous prototype for 'atm_dev_seq_stop' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] net/atm/resources.c:414:7: error: no previous prototype for 'atm_dev_seq_next' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] Add another #ifdef to leave these out of the build. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230516194625.549249-2-arnd@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- net/atm/resources.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/atm/resources.c b/net/atm/resources.c index 53236986dfe09..3ad39ae971323 100644 --- a/net/atm/resources.c +++ b/net/atm/resources.c @@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ int atm_dev_ioctl(unsigned int cmd, void __user *buf, int __user *sioc_len, return error; } +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS void *atm_dev_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos) { mutex_lock(&atm_dev_mutex); @@ -418,3 +419,4 @@ void *atm_dev_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos) { return seq_list_next(v, &atm_devs, pos); } +#endif -- 2.39.2
