Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] page_pool: fix inconsistency for page_pool_ring_[un]lock()" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 07:00:34PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sun, 28 May 2023 17:55:22 +0100 gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> 
> Do you track the missing backports?

Nope, once I email this off, it goes off of my radar.  But I know Sasha
sometimes tries to fix them up, as do others as it's an easy TODO list
for people who want to help out.

> We fumbled the Fixes tag on
> this one, turns out it's not needed further back than it applies.
> In such cases is it useful to let you know or just silently ignore 
> the failure notification?

It's good to say "this isn't needed" so that others don't spend time on
it, so thanks!

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux