Re: [PATCH] opp: Fix use-after-free in lazy_opp_tables after probe deferral

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24-05-23, 19:56, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> When dev_pm_opp_of_find_icc_paths() in _allocate_opp_table() returns
> -EPROBE_DEFER, the opp_table is freed again, to wait until all the
> interconnect paths are available.
> 
> However, if the OPP table is using required-opps then it may already
> have been added to the global lazy_opp_tables list. The error path
> does not remove the opp_table from the list again.
> 
> This can cause crashes later when the provider of the required-opps
> is added, since we will iterate over OPP tables that have already been
> freed. E.g.:
> 
>   Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference when read
>   CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc3
>   PC is at _of_add_opp_table_v2 (include/linux/of.h:949
>   drivers/opp/of.c:98 drivers/opp/of.c:344 drivers/opp/of.c:404
>   drivers/opp/of.c:1032) -> lazy_link_required_opp_table()
> 
> Fix this by removing the opp_table from the list before freeing it.

I think you need this instead:

diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
index 954c94865cf5..b5973fefdfd8 100644
--- a/drivers/opp/core.c
+++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
@@ -1358,7 +1358,10 @@ static struct opp_table *_allocate_opp_table(struct device *dev, int index)
        return opp_table;

 remove_opp_dev:
+       _of_clear_opp_table(opp_table);
        _remove_opp_dev(opp_dev, opp_table);
+       mutex_destroy(&opp_table->genpd_virt_dev_lock);
+       mutex_destroy(&opp_table->lock);
 err:
        kfree(opp_table);
        return ERR_PTR(ret);

> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: 7eba0c7641b0 ("opp: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps")
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This fixes the crash I ran into after adding an OPP table with
> both "required-opps" and interconnect paths (opp-peak-kBps).
> 
> By the way, the "lazy_opp_tables" does not seem to be protected by any
> locks(?)

It is always accessed with opp_table_lock held I believe.

-- 
viresh



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux