On 5/24/23 07:34, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 06:20:37PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 08:58:58PM +0200, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
On 12. 05. 2023. 15:09, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 02:34:29PM +0200, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
@@ -1011,6 +1016,11 @@ ssize_t trigger_batched_requests_async_store(struct device *dev,
mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
+ if (test_fw_config->reqs) {
+ rc = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_bail;
+ }
+
test_fw_config->reqs =
vzalloc(array3_size(sizeof(struct test_batched_req),
test_fw_config->num_requests, 2));
I was just thinking, since returning -EBUSY for the case of already allocated
test_fw_config->reqs was your suggestion and your idea, maybe it would be OK
to properly reflect that in Co-developed-by: or Signed-off-by: , but if I
understood well, the CoC requires that I am explicitly approved of those?
If everyone else is okay, let's just apply this as-is. You did all the
hard bits.
regards,
dan carpenter
If it is OK with you, then I hope I have your Reviewed-by:
Wow. Sorry for all the delay on this.
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for doing this work! It looks much better now split up!
No problem. It's a great exercise for the little grey cells :-)
For all 3 patches:
Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Mirsad
Greg, can you pick these up?
Luis
