From: Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@xxxxxxx>
commit 02ca9e6fb5f66a031df4fac508b8e477ca69e918 upstream.
When both of the superblock zones are full, we need to check which
superblock is newer. The calculation of last superblock position is wrong
as it does not consider zone_capacity and uses the length.
Fixes: 9658b72ef300 ("btrfs: zoned: locate superblock position using zone capacity")
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
@@ -119,10 +119,9 @@ static int sb_write_pointer(struct block
int i;
for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_NR_SB_LOG_ZONES; i++) {
- u64 bytenr;
-
- bytenr = ((zones[i].start + zones[i].len)
- << SECTOR_SHIFT) - BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE;
+ u64 zone_end = (zones[i].start + zones[i].capacity) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
+ u64 bytenr = ALIGN_DOWN(zone_end, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE) -
+ BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE;
page[i] = read_cache_page_gfp(mapping,
bytenr >> PAGE_SHIFT, GFP_NOFS);
