[PATCH 6.2 293/663] bpf: fix precision propagation verbose logging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 34f0677e7afd3a292bc1aadda7ce8e35faedb204 ]

Fix wrong order of frame index vs register/slot index in precision
propagation verbose (level 2) output. It's wrong and very confusing as is.

Fixes: 529409ea92d5 ("bpf: propagate precision across all frames, not just the last one")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230313184017.4083374-1-andrii@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index a53ba87a1cd2a..df353ba844f41 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -13678,7 +13678,7 @@ static int propagate_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			    !(state_reg->live & REG_LIVE_READ))
 				continue;
 			if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2)
-				verbose(env, "frame %d: propagating r%d\n", i, fr);
+				verbose(env, "frame %d: propagating r%d\n", fr, i);
 			err = mark_chain_precision_frame(env, fr, i);
 			if (err < 0)
 				return err;
@@ -13694,7 +13694,7 @@ static int propagate_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 				continue;
 			if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2)
 				verbose(env, "frame %d: propagating fp%d\n",
-					(-i - 1) * BPF_REG_SIZE, fr);
+					fr, (-i - 1) * BPF_REG_SIZE);
 			err = mark_chain_precision_stack_frame(env, fr, i);
 			if (err < 0)
 				return err;
-- 
2.39.2






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux