From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 4d73ba5fa710fe7d432e0b271e6fecd252aef66e upstream.
A bug was reported by Yuanxi Liu where allocating 1G pages at runtime is
taking an excessive amount of time for large amounts of memory. Further
testing allocating huge pages that the cost is linear i.e. if allocating
1G pages in batches of 10 then the time to allocate nr_hugepages from
10->20->30->etc increases linearly even though 10 pages are allocated at
each step. Profiles indicated that much of the time is spent checking the
validity within already existing huge pages and then attempting a
migration that fails after isolating the range, draining pages and a whole
lot of other useless work.
Commit eb14d4eefdc4 ("mm,page_alloc: drop unnecessary checks from
pfn_range_valid_contig") removed two checks, one which ignored huge pages
for contiguous allocations as huge pages can sometimes migrate. While
there may be value on migrating a 2M page to satisfy a 1G allocation, it's
potentially expensive if the 1G allocation fails and it's pointless to try
moving a 1G page for a new 1G allocation or scan the tail pages for valid
PFNs.
Reintroduce the PageHuge check and assume any contiguous region with
hugetlbfs pages is unsuitable for a new 1G allocation.
The hpagealloc test allocates huge pages in batches and reports the
average latency per page over time. This test happens just after boot
when fragmentation is not an issue. Units are in milliseconds.
hpagealloc
6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6
vanilla hugeallocrevert-v1r1 hugeallocsimple-v1r2
Min Latency 26.42 ( 0.00%) 5.07 ( 80.82%) 18.94 ( 28.30%)
1st-qrtle Latency 356.61 ( 0.00%) 5.34 ( 98.50%) 19.85 ( 94.43%)
2nd-qrtle Latency 697.26 ( 0.00%) 5.47 ( 99.22%) 20.44 ( 97.07%)
3rd-qrtle Latency 972.94 ( 0.00%) 5.50 ( 99.43%) 20.81 ( 97.86%)
Max-1 Latency 26.42 ( 0.00%) 5.07 ( 80.82%) 18.94 ( 28.30%)
Max-5 Latency 82.14 ( 0.00%) 5.11 ( 93.78%) 19.31 ( 76.49%)
Max-10 Latency 150.54 ( 0.00%) 5.20 ( 96.55%) 19.43 ( 87.09%)
Max-90 Latency 1164.45 ( 0.00%) 5.53 ( 99.52%) 20.97 ( 98.20%)
Max-95 Latency 1223.06 ( 0.00%) 5.55 ( 99.55%) 21.06 ( 98.28%)
Max-99 Latency 1278.67 ( 0.00%) 5.57 ( 99.56%) 22.56 ( 98.24%)
Max Latency 1310.90 ( 0.00%) 8.06 ( 99.39%) 26.62 ( 97.97%)
Amean Latency 678.36 ( 0.00%) 5.44 * 99.20%* 20.44 * 96.99%*
6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6
vanilla revert-v1 hugeallocfix-v2
Duration User 0.28 0.27 0.30
Duration System 808.66 17.77 35.99
Duration Elapsed 830.87 18.08 36.33
The vanilla kernel is poor, taking up to 1.3 second to allocate a huge
page and almost 10 minutes in total to run the test. Reverting the
problematic commit reduces it to 8ms at worst and the patch takes 26ms.
This patch fixes the main issue with skipping huge pages but leaves the
page_count() out because a page with an elevated count potentially can
migrate.
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217022
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414141429.pwgieuwluxwez3rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: eb14d4eefdc4 ("mm,page_alloc: drop unnecessary checks from pfn_range_valid_contig")
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Yuanxi Liu <y.liu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -9239,6 +9239,9 @@ static bool pfn_range_valid_contig(struc
if (PageReserved(page))
return false;
+
+ if (PageHuge(page))
+ return false;
}
return true;
}
