On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 4:58 PM David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Apr 2023, Yang Shi wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 12:30 AM David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On 24.03.23 21:12, Yang Shi wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 4:25 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On 3/23/23 21:45, Yang Shi wrote: > > > >>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 3:11 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Out of curiosity, is there any public link for this CVE? Google search > > > >>> can't find it. > > > >> > > > >> Only this one is live so far, AFAIK > > > >> > > > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180936 > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > There is now > > > > > > https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-1582 > > > > Thank you. > > > > Hi Yang, > > commit 24d7275ce2791829953ed4e72f68277ceb2571c6 > Author: Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Feb 11 16:32:26 2022 -0800 > > fs/proc: task_mmu.c: don't read mapcount for migration entry > > is backported to 5.10 stable but not to 5.4 or earlier stable trees. The > commit advertises to fix a commit from 4.5. > > Do we need stable backports for earlier trees or are they not affected? IIRC, it is needed. But I can't remember why it wasn't. Maybe just because the patch failed to apply to those trees and needs to backport the patch manually. > > Thanks!
