On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:31:47PM +0100, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:06:12AM +0100, zhangzhiqiang wrote: > > > hi all, > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > > > ref-cycles event is specially to Intel core, but can still used in arm architecture > > > with the wrong return value with 3.10 stable. for instance: > > > > > > perf stat -e ref-cycles sleep 1 > > > > > > Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1': > > > > > > 0 ref-cycles > > > > > > 1.002381916 seconds time elapsed > > > > > > this patch fix the bug and make it return NOT SUPPORTED > > > distinctly. > > > > > > In upstream this bug has been fixed by other way(not primary for the bug), which changes more than one file > > > and more than 1000 lines. the primary commit is 6b7658ec8a100b608e59e3cde353434db51f5be0. > > > besides we can not simply cherry-pick. > > > > I thought I saw Greg pick this up the other day? > > Yes, it's in 3.16.4, did I do something wrong by accepting it? Nah, it's a trivial patch that I struggle to get excited about. I'm just not sure why it's being sent again, after you already accepted it. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html