On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 01:54:28PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:24:11AM CEST, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:45:28PM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> >> On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 06:43:29 -0700
> >> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:29:42AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> [ ... snip ... ]
> >> > >
> >> > > Paul, Tehun, how do you propose to fix this on older kernels which do
> >> > > not have rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch? I'm particullary interested
> >> > > in 3.10.
> >> >
> >> > Hello, Jiri,
> >> >
> >> > Older kernels can instead use rcu_note_context_switch().
> >>
> >> Hi Paul,
> >>
> >> Does 4a81e8328d37 ("rcu: Reduce overhead of cond_resched() checks for
> >> RCU") affect a backport to 3.10?
> >>
> >> I noticed that rcu_note_context_switch added a call to
> >> rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle in that change, which is only present in
> >> v3.16+.
> >>
> >> Would rcu_note_context_switch be effective by itself on a 3.10 kernel?
> >
> >Should be fine. There is more overhead than current mainline, but that
> >should not be in the noise compared to executing a work-queue item.
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
>
> I cooked up following patch. Please tell me if it is fine or not. I can
> also send it oficially so it can be included into stable trees:
Looks good!
Thanx, Paul
> Subject: workqueue: Add quiescent state between work items
>
> Similar to the stop_machine deadlock scenario on !PREEMPT kernels
> addressed in b22ce2785d97 "workqueue: cond_resched() after processing
> each work item", kworker threads requeueing back-to-back with zero jiffy
> delay can stall RCU. The cond_resched call introduced in that fix will
> yield only iff there are other higher priority tasks to run, so force a
> quiescent RCU state between work items.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/workqueue.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index e9719c7..14a7163 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -2196,8 +2196,10 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
> * kernels, where a requeueing work item waiting for something to
> * happen could deadlock with stop_machine as such work item could
> * indefinitely requeue itself while all other CPUs are trapped in
> - * stop_machine.
> + * stop_machine. At the same time, report a quiescent RCU state so
> + * the same condition doesn't freeze RCU.
> */
> + rcu_note_context_switch(raw_smp_processor_id());
> cond_resched();
>
> spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
> --
> 1.9.3
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html