Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:36:59AM +0300, Stratos Karafotis wrote:

> For your information, commits:

> - 61c63e5ed3b9 cpufreq: Remove unused APERF/MPERF support
> - cffe4e0e7413 cpufreq: Remove unused function __cpufreq_driver_getavg()

> remove unused code (no other functional changes) as a result of
> commit dfa5bb622555. They all were part of the same patch set.

> I'm not familiar with the procedure of patch inclusion in stable trees,
> so please forgive me if this mail is just noise.

If they're just cleanups and not producing a functional change then the
standard thing would be to leave them out of stable.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]