On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:58:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:45:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > Actually I thinkoed here, as I said in reply to the stable mail the > > problematic patch was "19c763031acb8 cpufreq: serialize calls to > > __cpufreq_governor()" which was reverted in "56d07db cpufreq: Remove > > temporary fix for race between CPU hotplug and sysfs-writes". The above > > commit ID (95731eb) should be good. > > Sorry about the confusion here. > Ok, I'm still confused. I've applied 3 patches to the 3.10-stable > queue, in this order: To the best of my ability to assess: > 19c763031acb831a5ab9c1a701b7fedda073eb3f cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor() This one is bad. > a857c0b9e24e39fe5be82451b65377795f9538d8 cpufreq: Fix wrong time unit conversion > dfa5bb622555d9da0df21b50f46ebdeef390041b cpufreq: ondemand: Change the calculation of target frequency These two should be good. > Are those correct? Is there anything else I need to apply? > Note, 95731eb does not apply to 3.10-stable as it is already in there, > it showed up in 3.10.37. Ah, good - I think whatever made my cut'n'paste of the commit ID go wrong will have been responsible for making my search for it fail.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature