On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 11:18:43PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I think the best way forward is to make the built-in UARTs work with > debug_ll_io_init and then apply your patch again. Agreed, when I get some time I'll take a look at this again. I now have another PXA based board using built-in UARTs for the debug console so I can test a little more thoroughly. So for now: Acked: Andrew Ruder <andrew.ruder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on the revert. Sorry again for the churn - dropped the ball on this one. > On a more general note, my personal opinion is that in case of PXA, > we should not (yet) block additional board files because of missing DT > support. I think it's still a long way before it will work, and most > of the work is done by hobbyists, so I would allow new board files for > PXA to be added. Of course if the PXA maintainers think differently, > they can still ask you do to a DT port. I'm more of the opinion that we aren't that far from being able to block board files - I am 100% using device-tree and now have a single kernel that will boot on 3 different Elecsys boards. Not to mention the fact that I can't imagine there's a whole lot of new hardware work in the PXA realm. I have posted the work to my github account (http://github.com/aeruder/linux) but it is tough work getting things cleaned up to not break anyone not using DT (HAH, see this thread), documented, and submitted. I was really hoping the big mmc/DMA rewrite would drop into mainline at some point since that is one of the more terrible hacks I'm still maintaining over here. Cheers, Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html