From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit efbf35a102b20246cfe4409c6ae92e72ecb67ab8 ]
reclaim isn't set in the alloc case, however we only care about
reclaim in the !alloc case. This isn't an actual problem, however
-Wmaybe-uninitialized will complain, so initialize reclaim to quiet the
compiler.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Stable-dep-of: df384da5a49c ("btrfs: use temporary variable for space_info in btrfs_update_block_group")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
index 4b69945755e4f..380cb10f0d37b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -3259,7 +3259,7 @@ int btrfs_update_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
spin_unlock(&info->delalloc_root_lock);
while (total) {
- bool reclaim;
+ bool reclaim = false;
cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(info, bytenr);
if (!cache) {
--
2.39.2
