> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > ... > > e70af8d040d2 has a Fixes tag. Not sure why it's not automatically > backported. > > Because "Fixes:" is not the flag that we are sure to trigger off of. > Please read: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html > for how to do this properly. Thanks, I just read this again to refresh my memory :-) I remember Sasha has an AI algorithm to pick up patches into the stable tree and a "Fixes" tag should be a strong indicator. I tired to manually cherry-pick e70af8d040d2 to 5.15.y and got some merge conflicts. Probably that's why Sasha's script didn't automatically do the backport. @Carl, @Jeffrey, may I know if you have some cycles to help backport e70af8d040d2? > That being said, because some subsystem maintainers do NOT put cc: > stable in their patches, we do sometimes sweep the tree and try to pick > up things with only "Fixes:" but we don't always catch everything. > > So if you want to be sure a patch is applied, please always add a cc: > stable in the patch. > > greg k-h Hi Greg, since you're here, I'd like to ask a question: If I add the cc: stable line in a patch and use git-send-email to post the patch, git-send-email also posts the patch to the stable list -- is this acceptable? Sometimes a patch may have to undergo multiple revisions, meaning all the discussion emails go to the stable list unnecessarily, and I guess this is not good? It looks like there is no git-send-email option to exclude an email. Thanks, Dexuan