On 30.03.23 17:56, Peter Xu wrote:
This is a proposal to revert commit 914eedcb9ba0ff53c33808.
I found this when writting a simple UFFDIO_API test to be the first unit
test in this set. Two things breaks with the commit:
- UFFDIO_API check was lost and missing. According to man page, the
kernel should reject ioctl(UFFDIO_API) if uffdio_api.api != 0xaa. This
check is needed if the api version will be extended in the future, or
user app won't be able to identify which is a new kernel.
Agreed.
- Feature flags checks were removed, which means UFFDIO_API with a
feature that does not exist will also succeed. According to the man
page, we should (and it makes sense) to reject ioctl(UFFDIO_API) if
unknown features passed in.
Agreed.
I understand the motivation of the original commit, but it should not
have changed existing checks/functionality. Introducing a different way
to enable such functionality on explicit request would be better. But
maybe simple feature probing (is X support? is Y supported? is Z
supported) might be easier without requiring ABI changes.
I assume we better add
Fixes: 914eedcb9ba0 ("userfaultfd: don't fail on unrecognized features")
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220722201513.1624158-1-axelrasmussen@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index 8395605790f6..3b2a41c330e6 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1977,8 +1977,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_api(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
ret = -EFAULT;
if (copy_from_user(&uffdio_api, buf, sizeof(uffdio_api)))
goto out;
- /* Ignore unsupported features (userspace built against newer kernel) */
- features = uffdio_api.features & UFFD_API_FEATURES;
+ features = uffdio_api.features;
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ if (uffdio_api.api != UFFD_API || (features & ~UFFD_API_FEATURES))
+ goto err_out;
ret = -EPERM;
if ((features & UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK) && !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
goto err_out;
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
